On 2006-12-11, Robert Spanton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:10:26 +1100, Peter Jansen wrote:
>
>> So yes gcc-3.2.3 generates broken code in some case, there are many
>> options to make it generate the correct code, I suspect the problem is
>> somewhere in the gcc-3.2 language processing part, not in the msp430
>> backend.
>
> I just compiled gcc-3.2.3 for x86 and it accesses the value
> twice as well, which backs up the argument that it's a problem
> with the backend.
Do you mean that it's _not_ a problem with the backend?
> I've been using the "copy to local variable" trick. This
> sucks,
Why? It probably generates exactly the same code that a
"fixed" compiler would.
> but never mind.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm pretending that
at we're all watching PHIL
visi.com SILVERS instead of RICARDO
MONTALBAN!
