Oleg Verych @ Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:56:28 +0000 (UTC) [] > This is problem of high-level design, or blame whatever you want (e.g. > 8-bit past, Intel+MS hegemony, C and its "implementation-defined"), but > not msp430 toolchain. > > C was meant to be a macro-language for PDP-11 or something like that. And > all this is *text*. 30+ years of C, 20+ years of diff + patch -- > something is very strange with _modern software technology_.
Yes, *(--i)/*(i++) make such impression: + http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TI_MSP430 `+ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDP-11 "A popular but false folk myth is that the instruction set architecture of the PDP-11 influenced the idiomatic use of the C programming language." ____
