> And for the need of a server, well, yes, sure. Every repository needs to be > stored somewhere. Without access to the storage place I cannot access the > repository. No matter whether it is a dedicated server, some > webspace somewhere or a mesh cloud.
> But it was just an idea. With everything else I looked upon (quick glances > only, admitted) it seemed to me I'd be > > more busy handling the repository than working with the project. When > choosing my tools, my top citeria > is always usability (and maybe price, which had lead me originally to mspgcc). Well, regarding to my opinion, DVCS are more easy to setup and use. In fact, they do not need any setup at all. Basically, all what you need to share a repository with DVCS, it's to create a directory on a server and assign the user/group. Comparing to SVN it's almost no-brainer. >From the point of ease of use, the champion, probably is Mercurial (hg). But on my opinion, it's better to make an effort and learn the git. It's probably most powerful DVCS on the moment. It's just my opinion, nothing more. I've been using the bazaar for some years, but I switched to git a half of year ago and I'm very impressed of it. --- Regards, Dmitry
