Thanks very much for the elaboration. I had hoped it would be as you said. I had already decided to go with mspgcc4, but it isn't too late to change direction.
> If you start a new development, you'll have to validate your > product anyway, so it doesn't make much of a difference. Agreed. As a rule of thumb, when starting a new project I try to choose the best compiler for the job. On a mature project (one that has been shipping for a while or one that has a lot of test history and/or is about to ship) I upgrade with extreme reluctance. Deciding exactly when a project has reached 'maturity' is a matter of experience and is subjective. More than once I have chosen poorly and ended up switching back to prior version that had just been 'upgraded.' Such experiences tend to strengthen the reluctance to 'change horses in mid-stream.' Thanks again for the feedback! I'll continue on with mspgcc4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
