Le 13/02/2011 04:34, Mark J. Blair a écrit : > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Peter Bigot wrote: >> How many people depend on insight? I was under the impression it wasn't >> used much. > > Sorry, I'm a couple weeks late to the party! > > I don't depend on Insight at all, simply because I haven't been able to > compile it on my system (Mac OS X) yet. I'd give it a try if I could build > it. ;)
Don't feel alone: I can't either, on a 64-bit Ubuntu, but the same holds true for all I believe: If I'm not mistaken, the GDB and Insight sources usable in the latest MSPGCC4 release are mutually incompatible, due at least to a minor difference between argument qualifiers in a function prototype. I would like to offer a patch but I am not sure how to proceed, because I don't have a clear idea yet of exactly how MSPGCC4 is built; it seems that actually it is provided as patches against the pristine gcc and binutil sources, so in order to test that my fix works I would need to 'back-patch' the fix into the patch files, but I don't know how to regenerate those properly -- or even if I understood the process at all, to be honest. :) Is there an overview of the development of MSPGCC4? Amicalement, -- Albert. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
