OK. Let's see if other platforms have an issue. I don't see how the change would cause problems (it doesn't on fedora 15) but as I said it's in an area I don't fully understand.
If you can run the xgcc command under gdb and send me a stack trace off-list that could help. Peter On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Matthias Ringwald <matth...@ringwald.ch> wrote: > Hi > > I tried to be first to say "added patch to fink!", but the compilation fails > during config of "libgcc" after applying the latest patch for gcc. > Here's a snippet from the config.log > > configure:2993: > /sw/src/fink.build/msp430-gcc-4.5.3-20110716-5/build/./gcc/xgcc > -B/sw/src/fink.build/msp430-gcc-4.5.3-20110716-5/build/./gcc/ > -B/sw/lib/msp430/msp430/bin/ -B/sw/lib/msp430/msp430/lib/ -isystem > /sw/lib/msp430/msp430/include -isystem /sw/lib/msp430/msp430/sys-include > -qversion >&5 > xgcc: no input files > configure:3004: $? = 1 > configure:3020: > /sw/src/fink.build/msp430-gcc-4.5.3-20110716-5/build/./gcc/xgcc > -B/sw/src/fink.build/msp430-gcc-4.5.3-20110716-5/build/./gcc/ > -B/sw/lib/msp430/msp430/bin/ -B/sw/lib/msp430/msp430/lib/ -isystem > /sw/lib/msp430/msp430/include -isystem /sw/lib/msp430/msp430/sys-include > -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 > conftest.c:1:0: internal compiler error: Bus error > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. > configure:3023: $? = 1 > configure:3211: checking for suffix of object files > configure:3233: > /sw/src/fink.build/msp430-gcc-4.5.3-20110716-5/build/./gcc/xgcc > -B/sw/src/fink.build/msp430-gcc-4.5.3-20110716-5/build/./gcc/ > -B/sw/lib/msp430/msp430/bin/ -B/sw/lib/msp430/msp430/lib/ -isystem > /sw/lib/msp430/msp430/include -isystem /sw/lib/msp430/msp430/sys-include > -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 > conftest.c:1:0: internal compiler error: Bus error > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. > configure:3237: $? = 1 > configure: failed program was: > | /* confdefs.h */ > | #define PACKAGE_NAME "GNU C Runtime Library" > | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "libgcc" > | #define PACKAGE_VERSION "1.0" > | #define PACKAGE_STRING "GNU C Runtime Library 1.0" > | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "" > | #define PACKAGE_URL "http://www.gnu.org/software/libgcc/"; > | /* end confdefs.h. */ > | > | int > | main () > | { > | > | ; > | return 0; > | } > configure:3251: error: in > `/sw/src/fink.build/msp430-gcc-4.5.3-20110716-5/build/msp430/libgcc': > configure:3254: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile > See `config.log' for more details. > > The 'bus error' doesn't look like it was an error in the patch though. Just > wanted to let others know. > > Best > matthias > > > > > On 21.09.2011, at 19:41, Peter Bigot wrote: > >> There's a new LTS patch that addresses this issue available at >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/mspgcc/files/Patches/LTS/20110716/. >> >> It appears to be an upstream register allocator bug. I don't entirely >> trust it, as upstream gcc hasn't confirmed the solution, but I'm >> confident enough to give it a shot. It does fix the problem for the >> TinyOS example and the non-TinyOS reproducer. >> >> Peter >> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Michiel Konstapel >> <m.konsta...@sownet.nl> wrote: >>> Except, apparently, the other attachments didn't make it either. I guess >>> they're not allowed by the mailing list. >>> Anyway, I've also attached them to the bug report: >>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3409864&group_id=42303&atid=432701 >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Michiel Konstapel [mailto:m.konsta...@sownet.nl] >>>> Sent: donderdag 15 september 2011 15:04 >>>> To: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] uint64_t issue? >>>> >>>> Sorry if this shows up twice; I've removed the 200 KB app.c from the >>>> attachments. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Michiel Konstapel >>>> Sent: donderdag 15 september 2011 13:40 >>>> To: MSPGCC mailing list, >>>> Subject: RE: [Mspgcc-users] uint64_t issue? >>>> >>>> I've managed to isolate it into a small (TinyOS) program. I've attached >>>> the source and build outputs. msp430-gcc is (eventually) invoked as >>>> follows: >>>> >>>> msp430-gcc -B/usr/lib/ncc -mdisable-watchdog -mmcu=msp430f2418 - >>>> mcpu=430x -mmpy=16se -mivcnt=32 -Os -Wall -Wshadow -v -o >>>> /tmp/ccRWyH2t.o -c -fdollars-in-identifiers build/gnode/app.c >>>> >>>> I'll also create a ticket on SF with the files attached. >>>> Best, >>>> Michiel >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: JMGross [mailto:msp...@grossibaer.de] >>>>> Sent: donderdag 15 september 2011 12:32 >>>>> To: MSPGCC mailing list, >>>>> Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] uint64_t issue? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Or the optimizer is the problem. When you don't use the hardware >>>>> multiplier, even simple 8 and 16 bit multiplications are not inlined >>>>> but require a function call. >>>>> So optimization is different then. >>>>> What if you turn optimization off and use the HWM? >>>>> Does the bug still appear? >>>>> >>>>> It looks like a problem with the stack frame. >>>>> >>>>> I had a similar problem with 3.2.3: >>>>> When you called a function with parameters passed on stack and the >>>>> function did have local variables that didn't go into a register, >>>>> things were messed-up with optimization on, while with optimization >>>>> off all was well. >>>>> >>>>> Just an idea. >>>>> >>>>> JMGross >>>>> >>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----- >>>>> Von: Michiel Konstapel >>>>> Gesendet am: 14 Sep 2011 16:30:35 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the reply guys, I'll try with a fresh. >>>>> Another data point: if I use -mmpy=none, it works, so it appears to >>>> be >>>>> related to the hardware multiplier. >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Eric Decker [mailto:cire...@gmail.com] >>>>>> Sent: woensdag 14 september 2011 16:21 >>>>>> To: Peter Bigot >>>>>> Cc: Michiel Konstapel; mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] uint64_t issue? >>>>>> >>>>>> Michel please try again but use one of the more current builds from >>>>>> >>>>>> http://tinyprod.net/razvanm/debian >>>>>> >>>>>> From cPhone >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 14, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Peter Bigot <big...@acm.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Interesting. I'll have to figure out where that extra >>>> information >>>>> is >>>>>>> getting added; when I do that on one of my internal builds, I >>>> just >>>>>> get 4.5.3 >>>>>>> with no msp430-specific version information. Somebody's adding >>>>>> something >>>>>>> somewhere. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The 20110428 bit raises eyebrows. No idea where that comes from, >>>>> but >>>>>> if >>>>>>> it's real, that'd be a large part of your problem. Take that up >>>>> with >>>>>>> whoever built the distribution you're using. Or, duplicate the >>>>>> problem with >>>>>>> a clean build of the official 20110716 release updated with the >>>>>> current LTS >>>>>>> patches and report as a ticket. Thanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Michiel Konstapel >>>>>> <m.konsta...@sownet.nl>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Update on the mspgcc version: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> $ msp430-gcc --version >>>>>>>> msp430-gcc (GCC) 4.5.3 20110428 (msp430) LTS_20110716_0813 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: Michiel Konstapel [mailto:m.konsta...@sownet.nl] >>>>>>>>> Sent: woensdag 14 september 2011 14:38 >>>>>>>>> To: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>>>>> Subject: [Mspgcc-users] uint64_t issue? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think I've run into a compiler bug, but I'm not sure how to >>>>>>>>> pin >>>>>> it >>>>>>>>> down. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm using the TinyOS RandomMlcg random generator: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> /* Return the next 32 bit random number */ async command >>>>>>>>> uint32_t Random.rand32() { >>>>>>>>> uint32_t mlcg,p,q; >>>>>>>>> uint64_t tmpseed; >>>>>>>>> atomic >>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>> tmpseed = (uint64_t)33614U * (uint64_t)seed; >>>>>>>>> q = tmpseed; /* low */ >>>>>>>>> q = q >> 1; >>>>>>>>> p = tmpseed >> 32 ; /* hi */ >>>>>>>>> mlcg = p + q; >>>>>>>>> if (mlcg & 0x80000000) { >>>>>>>>> mlcg = mlcg & 0x7FFFFFFF; >>>>>>>>> mlcg++; >>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>> seed = mlcg; >>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>> return mlcg; >>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now, in my program, I have a function that takes one argument. >>>>>> After >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> call to Random.rand16(), this argument is overwritten by the >>>>> value >>>>>>>>> 0x834e - which is 33614U. This happens with mspgcc4 (20110813) >>>>> but >>>>>> not >>>>>>>>> with 3.2.3. My trivial test program failed to reproduce this; >>>>> I'll >>>>>> see >>>>>>>>> if I can find a way to trigger it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The context in which it's called (noinlined so I can find it in >>>>> the >>>>>>>>> disassembly): >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> void backoff(uint16_t fixed) __attribute__((noinline)) { >>>>>>>>> uint16_t delay = 0; >>>>>>>>> printf("fixed=%u\n", fixed); // here, fixed is >>>>>>>>> correct >>>>>>>>> delay = call Random.rand16(); >>>>>>>>> printf("fixed=%u\n", fixed); // here, fixed == >>>>>> 0x834e >>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For reference, the disassembly of the working version (3.2.3) >>>>>> followed >>>>>>>>> by the broken one, up to the second call to printf: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 3.2.3: >>>>>>>>> 00005204 <SendP__backoff>: >>>>>>>>> 5204: 1b 15 .word 0x151b; ???? >>>>>>>>> 5206: 0a 4f mov r15, r10 >>>>>>>>> 5208: 0f 12 push r15 >>>>>>>>> 520a: 30 12 fa 51 push #20986 ;#0x51fa >>>>>>>>> 520e: b0 13 .word 0x13b0; ???? >>>>>>>>> 5210: 6a 7d subc.b @r13, r10 >>>>>>>>> 5212: 21 52 add #4, r1 ;r2 >>>> As==10 >>>>>>>>> 5214: b0 13 .word 0x13b0; ???? >>>>>>>>> 5216: 5e 52 0b 4e add.b &0x4e0b,r14 >>>>>>>>> 521a: 0a 12 push r10 >>>>>>>>> 521c: 30 12 fa 51 push #20986 ;#0x51fa >>>>>>>>> 5220: b0 13 .word 0x13b0; ???? >>>>>>>>> 5222: 6a 7d subc.b @r13, r10 >>>>>>>>> 5224: 21 52 add #4, r1 ;r2 >>>> As==10 >>>>>>>>> 5226: 0a 4b mov r11, r10 >>>>>>>>> 5228: 0b 43 clr r11 >>>>>>>>> 522a: b0 13 .word 0x13b0; ???? >>>>>>>>> 522c: f6 34 jge $+494 ;abs >>>>> 0x541a >>>>>>>>> 522e: 53 12 push.b #1 ;r3 >>>> As==01 >>>>>>>>> 5230: 0b 12 push r11 >>>>>>>>> 5232: 0a 12 push r10 >>>>>>>>> 5234: 0d 4e mov r14, r13 >>>>>>>>> 5236: 0e 4f mov r15, r14 >>>>>>>>> 5238: 7f 40 03 00 mov.b #3, r15 ;#0x0003 >>>>>>>>> 523c: b0 13 .word 0x13b0; ???? >>>>>>>>> 523e: 4a 42 mov.b r2, r10 >>>>>>>>> 5240: 31 50 06 00 add #6, r1 ;#0x0006 >>>>>>>>> 5244: 1f 42 70 14 mov &0x1470,r15 >>>>>>>>> 5248: 0f 5f rla r15 >>>>>>>>> 524a: 82 4f 70 14 mov r15, &0x1470 >>>>>>>>> 524e: 3f 90 11 00 cmp #17, r15 ;#0x0011 >>>>>>>>> 5252: 03 28 jnc $+8 ;abs >>>>> 0x525a >>>>>>>>> 5254: b2 40 10 00 mov #16, &0x1470 ;#0x0010 >>>>>>>>> 5258: 70 14 >>>>>>>>> 525a: 1a 17 .word 0x171a; ???? >>>>>>>>> 525c: 10 01 .word 0x0110; ???? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 0000525e <RandomMlcgC__Random__rand32>: >>>>>>>>> 525e: 4b 15 .word 0x154b; ???? >>>>>>>>> 5260: b0 13 .word 0x13b0; ???? >>>>>>>>> 5262: 8a 31 jn $+790 ;abs >>>>> 0x5578 >>>>>>>>> 5264: 47 4f mov.b r15, r7 >>>>>>>>> 5266: 1c 42 c8 13 mov &0x13c8,r12 >>>>>>>>> 526a: 1d 42 ca 13 mov &0x13ca,r13 >>>>>>>>> 526e: 0e 43 clr r14 >>>>>>>>> 5270: 0f 43 clr r15 >>>>>>>>> 5272: 03 12 push #0 ;r3 >>>> As==00 >>>>>>>>> 5274: 03 12 push #0 ;r3 >>>> As==00 >>>>>>>>> 5276: 03 12 push #0 ;r3 >>>> As==00 >>>>>>>>> 5278: 30 12 4e 83 push #-31922 ;#0x834e >>>>>>>>> 527c: b0 13 .word 0x13b0; ???? >>>>>>>>> 527e: f6 86 31 52 sub.b @r6+, >>>>> 21041(r6);0x5231(r6) >>>>>>>>> 5282: 0a 4c mov r12, r10 >>>>>>>>> 5284: 0b 4d mov r13, r11 >>>>>>>>> 5286: 12 c3 clrc >>>>>>>>> 5288: 0b 10 rrc r11 >>>>>>>>> 528a: 0a 10 rrc r10 >>>>>>>>> 528c: 0c 4e mov r14, r12 >>>>>>>>> 528e: 0d 4f mov r15, r13 >>>>>>>>> 5290: 0e 43 clr r14 >>>>>>>>> 5292: 0f 43 clr r15 >>>>>>>>> 5294: 08 4c mov r12, r8 >>>>>>>>> 5296: 09 4d mov r13, r9 >>>>>>>>> 5298: 08 5a add r10, r8 >>>>>>>>> 529a: 09 6b addc r11, r9 >>>>>>>>> 529c: 39 b0 00 80 bit #-32768,r9 ;#0x8000 >>>>>>>>> 52a0: 04 24 jz $+10 ;abs >>>>> 0x52aa >>>>>>>>> 52a2: 39 f0 ff 7f and #32767, r9 ;#0x7fff >>>>>>>>> 52a6: 18 53 inc r8 >>>>>>>>> 52a8: 09 63 adc r9 >>>>>>>>> 52aa: 82 48 c8 13 mov r8, &0x13c8 >>>>>>>>> 52ae: 82 49 ca 13 mov r9, &0x13ca >>>>>>>>> 52b2: 4f 47 mov.b r7, r15 >>>>>>>>> 52b4: b0 13 .word 0x13b0; ???? >>>>>>>>> 52b6: 9e 31 jn $+830 ;abs >>>>> 0x55f4 >>>>>>>>> 52b8: 0e 48 mov r8, r14 >>>>>>>>> 52ba: 0f 49 mov r9, r15 >>>>>>>>> 52bc: 47 17 .word 0x1747; ???? >>>>>>>>> 52be: 10 01 .word 0x0110; ???? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 20110813 inlines the call: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 00004c90 <SendP__backoff>: >>>>>>>>> 4c90: 0b 12 push r11 >>>>>>>>> 4c92: 0a 12 push r10 >>>>>>>>> 4c94: 09 12 push r9 >>>>>>>>> 4c96: 08 12 push r8 >>>>>>>>> 4c98: 07 12 push r7 >>>>>>>>> 4c9a: 06 12 push r6 >>>>>>>>> 4c9c: 05 12 push r5 >>>>>>>>> 4c9e: 04 12 push r4 >>>>>>>>> 4ca0: 21 83 decd r1 >>>>>>>>> 4ca2: 0f 12 push r15 >>>>>>>>> 4ca4: 0f 12 push r15 >>>>>>>>> 4ca6: 30 12 80 4c push #19584 ;#0x4c80 >>>>>>>>> 4caa: b0 12 b8 76 call #0x76b8 >>>>>>>>> 4cae: 31 50 06 00 add #6, r1 ;#0x0006 >>>>>>>>> 4cb2: b0 12 06 3a call #0x3a06 >>>>>>>>> 4cb6: c1 4f 00 00 mov.b r15, 0(r1) >>>>> ;0x0000(r1) >>>>>>>>> 4cba: 18 42 cc 13 mov &0x13cc,r8 >>>>>>>>> 4cbe: 19 42 ce 13 mov &0x13ce,r9 >>>>>>>>> 4cc2: 34 40 4e 83 mov #-31922,r4 ;#0x834e >>>>>>>>> 4cc6: 05 43 clr r5 >>>>>>>>> 4cc8: b0 12 36 7c call #0x7c36 >>>>>>>>> 4ccc: 0a 4c mov r12, r10 >>>>>>>>> 4cce: 0b 4d mov r13, r11 >>>>>>>>> 4cd0: 12 c3 clrc >>>>>>>>> 4cd2: 0b 10 rrc r11 >>>>>>>>> 4cd4: 0a 10 rrc r10 >>>>>>>>> 4cd6: 0a 5e add r14, r10 >>>>>>>>> 4cd8: 0b 6f addc r15, r11 >>>>>>>>> 4cda: 0b 93 tst r11 >>>>>>>>> 4cdc: 05 34 jge $+12 ;abs >>>>> 0x4ce8 >>>>>>>>> 4cde: 3a f3 and #-1, r10 ;r3 >>>> As==11 >>>>>>>>> 4ce0: 3b f0 ff 7f and #32767, r11 ;#0x7fff >>>>>>>>> 4ce4: 1a 53 inc r10 >>>>>>>>> 4ce6: 0b 63 adc r11 >>>>>>>>> 4ce8: 82 4a cc 13 mov r10, &0x13cc >>>>>>>>> 4cec: 82 4b ce 13 mov r11, &0x13ce >>>>>>>>> 4cf0: 6f 41 mov.b @r1, r15 >>>>>>>>> 4cf2: b0 12 1a 3a call #0x3a1a >>>>>>>>> 4cf6: 04 12 push r4 >>>>>>>>> 4cf8: 04 12 push r4 >>>>>>>>> 4cfa: 30 12 80 4c push #19584 ;#0x4c80 >>>>>>>>> 4cfe: b0 12 b8 76 call #0x76b8 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm afraid my assembly-fu isn't very strong, but I hope someone >>>>> can >>>>>>>>> glean... something from it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Michiel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> ------- >>>>>>>>> BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA >>>>>>>>> Learn about the latest advances in developing for the >>>>>>>>> BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. >>>>>>>>> See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® >>>>> DevCon >>>>>>>>> today! >>>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Mspgcc-users mailing list >>>>>>>>> Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>>> BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA >>>>>>>> Learn about the latest advances in developing for the >>>>>>>> BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. >>>>>>>> See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® >>>>> DevCon >>>>>> today! >>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Mspgcc-users mailing list >>>>>>>> Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> --------- >>>>>>> BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA >>>>>>> Learn about the latest advances in developing for the >>>>>>> BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. >>>>>>> See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® >>>>>>> DevCon >>>>>> today! >>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Mspgcc-users mailing list >>>>>>> Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> - >>>>> - >>>>> ------- >>>>> BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn >>>>> about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® >>>> mobile >>>>> platform with sessions, labs & more. >>>>> See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon >>>>> today! >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mspgcc-users mailing list >>>>> Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> - >>>>> - >>>>> ------- >>>>> Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are >>>> the >>>>> key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses >>>>> from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual >>>>> desktops >>>>> provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more >>>>> affordable virtual desktop >>>>> model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mspgcc-users mailing list >>>>> Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop >>> What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses >>> from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops >>> provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable >>> virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mspgcc-users mailing list >>> Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a >> definitive record of customers, application performance, security >> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes >> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 >> _______________________________________________ >> Mspgcc-users mailing list >> Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 > _______________________________________________ > Mspgcc-users mailing list > Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
