On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 4:32 AM, priyasheel prasad <priyasheel1...@gmail.com> wrote: > The code you provided we were able to compile without problem. Since > we have an MSP430BT5190 from the eZ430-RF2500 development kit, we > think that the UART may need some further configuration. The website > for our kit shows the uart TX and RX lines on port 10.4 (tx) and port > 10.5 (rx). > > To begin with we put in some code to alternatively blink the test > LEDs. The program which we wrote is attached (uart-blink folder) and > when loaded to our kit does blink the LEDs. However the character we > send out doesn't appear. > > Looking at your sample code, we suspect the problem may be in clock > configuration. For a 9600 baud clock I suppose we need to divide the > main clock which is at 25 MHz. However, at present I am working to > better understand the UART configuration code. > > If you have any suggestions for corrections or further reading on the > subject, help would be greatly appreciated.
http://www.43oh.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2067#p15011 Peter > > Thanks. > > Best, > Priyasheel > > > On 12/24/11, Peter Bigot <big...@acm.org> wrote: >> The CVS examples are for a different generation of chips than your >> RF2560T/MSP430BT5190, and the UART hardware is completely different. >> You would be better off using the MSP430F5438A examples from >> http://www.ti.com/product/msp430f5438A#toolssoftware. You will have >> to convert the interrupt syntax to mspgcc's function attribute form; >> see the list archives or the test430 package for examples. >> >> There is also basic UART transmit code for the MSP430F5438A in the >> support/exp430f5438 directory of test430. See >> http://mspgcc.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=mspgcc/test430;a=tree;f=support/exp430f5438;h=c2fed089c1187dbbf0cb63130045ebc77468c917;hb=HEAD >> for now; a new release should be out in a couple days. >> >> Peter >> >> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:11 AM, priyasheel prasad >> <priyasheel1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Presently I am experimenting with the UART using mspgcc and a TI >>> ez430-rf2560 kit. I noticed that there were some UART example programs >>> in the CVS tree for mspgcc. And so I downloaded the examples: >>> >>> # checkout examples from CVS >>> cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonym...@mspgcc.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/mspgcc >>> co examples >>> >>> I found that if I edited the Makefile in the examples/leds directory >>> to change the CPU from msp430z1101 to msp430f5438a the compile is >>> successful. Using "mspdebug rf2500" I can load the leds.elf file to my >>> microcontroller and the LEDs blink. >>> >>> However, if I try the same procedure with the uart_test example I >>> receive a large number of compile errors: >>> >>> main.c: In function ‘main’: >>> main.c:61:5: error: ‘IE1’ undeclared (first use in this function) >>> main.c:61:5: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once >>> for each function it appears in >>> main.c:62:5: error: ‘IE2’ undeclared (first use in this function) >>> main.c:63:5: error: ‘ME1’ undeclared (first use in this function) >>> [...] >>> >>> Moreover I notice the unmodified code produces a compile error as well: >>> >>> main.c:86:14: error: ‘SSEL_SMCLK’ undeclared (first use in this function) >>> >>> How can I go about debugging this code for my particular processor? >>> Does anyone else have some experience porting these examples to >>> different development kits like the ez430-rf2560? >>> >>> Thank you in advance. >>> >>> Best, >>> Priyasheel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Write once. Port to many. >>> Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create >>> new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the >>> Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mspgcc-users mailing list >>> Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
