On 2012-05-16, Stefan N?rnberger <s...@zelle79.org> wrote:
> If it is purely about code size you should definitely compile without
> the debugging symbols (drop the -g switch). This should reduce the
> size of the binary dramatically.
If that's true, it's a compiler bug isn't it?. Enabling debug symbols
should not affect the generated code or the size of the resulting text
segment. Enabling debug symbols with certain types of optimization
doesn't always produce usable results (in terms of setting breakpoints
on particular source lines, single-stepping, etc.), but it shouldn't
produce a larger code size.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! We have DIFFERENT
at amounts of HAIR --
gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
