On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Radu Rendec <[email protected]>wrote:
> **
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 13:51 -0600, Peter Bigot wrote:
>
> FWIW, 20120911 is essentially solid, and I have no intentions to make
> changes to it. The reasons it's not officially LTS are influenced by lack
> of time and motivation on my part. I'd be more likely to fix such a
> problem in that release, though the bar for fixes even there is pretty high
> now that mspgcc is being superseded by the RH/TI upstream effort.
>
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thanks for the detailed explanation! It makes perfect sense.
> Does 20120911 still support generating 16-bit code? I know the gcc 4.7
> branch adds support for 20-bit addresses, but I have no idea if I can
> choose what kind of code to produce (or in other words if it's backwards
> compatible).
>
It only uses 20-bit addresses if told to do so; by default it should work
about the same as the previous releases.
Peter
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
