On 2013-04-21, Paul Sokolovsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 17:06:51 -0500 Peter Bigot <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This decision was intentional, as documented in
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc/bugs/118/. My recollection is that
>> the choice of how to make things consistent was informed by similar
>> behavior in the contemporaneous gcc for x86 or at least one other
>> target architecture.
>
> Thanks for the reference. So, I tested it with x86 gcc 4.4, 4.5, 4.6,
> 4.7 (packages as shipped by Ubuntu), all of them produce
> mathematically expected result.
That's irrelevent.
> msp430-gcc 4.5.3, 4.7.0 both produce unexpected result.
That's per the standard. If you write code that depends on some
particular behavior for somethign that's "undefined", then that code
is wrong.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I'm wearing PAMPERS!!
at
gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
