I have Server 2012 running with storage pool on JBOD and I’m getting roughly 51% in space savings, which is about 1.58TB.
PS C:\Windows\system32> get-dedupvolume Enabled SavedSpace SavingsRate Volum ------- ---------- ----------- ----- True 1.58 TB 51 % R: True 0 B 0 % I: True 4.45 GB 2 % V: So I would go with Server 2012 for sure. Plus, going with Server 2012 keeps you in a supported OS longer. 😊 Sent from Windows Mail From: Jason Sandys Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 11:15 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com True but Server 2012 SIS is at a binary level whereas the ConfigMgr SIS is at a file level. I’ve seen reports of significant savings. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Russ Rimmerman Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:46 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Server 2012 vs Server 2008 R2 But you get SiS w/SCCM 2012 in the contentlib with or without Server 2012 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:39 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] Server 2012 vs Server 2008 R2 Single Instance Storage in Server 2012. Reduces Disk Space. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Christopher Duszynski <christoph...@slalom.com> wrote: Is there any benefits to install SCCM 2012 SP1 on Windows Server 2012 vs. Server 2008 R2. If so can you provide me with your justification?
