Yeah, that's one bug that Microsoft never fixed! Thanks, ________________________________
Mark Mears mark.me...@cireson.com<mailto:mark.me...@cireson.com%0d> Phone: (757) 945-2651 [cid:image001.png@01CEAC8E.61A72300]<http://www.cireson.com/> [cid:image002.jpg@01CEAC8E.61A72300]<http://twitter.com/teamcireson> Check out our System Center App Store: www.cireson.com/app-store ________________________________ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of s kissel Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 4:21 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Shared DPs missing from Source Hierarchy after R2 Upgrade Non-Issue. They started appearing 5-6 hours after re-initializing site migrations and even doing forced "Gather Data Now" operations, refreshes, closing and reopening the console, etc.. "Slow Moving Software" is still relevant :) ________________________________ From: sakis...@outlook.com<mailto:sakis...@outlook.com> To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Shared DPs missing from Source Hierarchy after R2 Upgrade Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:45:17 -0600 Hey all, Anyone run into this before and/or can think of a solution? Scenario 1. SCCM 2007 SP2 R3 set as Source Hierarchy for SCCM 2012 SP1 CU3 site. 2. Decide to upgrade to SCCM 2012 R2 3. Stop data gathering on central and all primary SCCM 2007 Source Hierarchy sites (the R2 installer won't continue if you don't do this) 4. Install R2 on the CAS 5. Install Hotfix KB2905002 on the CAS 6. Configure site credentials for central and all primary SCCM 2007 sites, checking the "Enable distribution-point sharing for this source site", and resume data gathering 7. Viewing the Shared Distribution Points tab for all primary SCCM 2007 source hierarchy sites is now empty - these values were there before. One huge plus is that software distributions still seem to occur from those shared distribution points that no longer appear, but seeing them listed would put minds at ease. The primary sites have not yet been upgraded - would that make a difference? -S
<<inline: image005.png>>
<<inline: image006.jpg>>
