Using DA for a year plus now ... very easy to setup and works a charm. Robert
[email protected] wrote: >PKI isn't that bad at all, IBCM on the other hand is very involve and >you don't get the same functionality. > >DA gives you the whole feature set, including Remote Control. >If you have ip v4 only devices that the remote machines need to talk to >you will need either ISATAP or DNS64. > >Christopher Catlett >Consultant | Detroit >[MCTS_2013_small] > >Sogeti USA >Office 248-876-9738 |Fax 877.406.9647 >26957 Northwestern Highway, Suite 130, Southfield, MI 48033-8456 >www.us.sogeti.com<http://www.us.sogeti.com/> > >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan >Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:05 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012, PKI and ICBM > >The official Microsoft TechNet documentation is excellent. > >Remote Access (DirectAccess, Routing and Remote Access) >Overview<http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831416.aspx> > >Cheers, >Trevor Sullivan > >From: >[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian McDonald >Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:13 PM >To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012, PKI and ICBM > >Ouch...thanks guys. > >Never setup DirectAccess either. Anyone point me to some good >resources? > >Thanks! >Rich >________________________________ >From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012, PKI and ICBM >Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:53:17 -0600 >+1, working on a project now to plan for DirectAccess instead of IBCM >for remote clients. > >Cheers, >Trevor Sullivan > >From: >[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan >Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 3:51 PM >To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012, PKI and ICBM > >It is my opinion as well that IBCM is hard to set up. We have aborted >our effort for now. > >Ivan Lindenfeld > >From: >[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian McDonald >Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:29 PM >To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012, PKI and ICBM > >Great question and I'm glad you asked. > >Possibly. :) > >Would that be the opinion of most in the group? > >Thanks, >Brian > >________________________________ >From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:55:54 -0600 >Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012, PKI and ICBM >Can you use Direct Access?? Much simpler to setup. ICBM is a lot of >work. > >From: >[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian McDonald >Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 2:52 PM >To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >Subject: [mssms] SCCM 2012, PKI and ICBM > >Hey everyone, > >Just out of curiosity, how many hours would you estimate it would take >to setup a PKI infrastructure and ICBM for SCCM 2012 R2? My boss has >asked me to implement and I have no idea what to guestimate for hours. >Looking for someone who has experience with implementing both PKI and >ICBM that might be able to give me a rough idea of how many hours this >would take. From what I've read ICBM is complex to setup, but that was >back in CM07. Not sure how much has changed with CM12. > >Thanks, > >Brian
