I do.. where do I vote?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Miller, Todd
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 2:35 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Power management in SCCM 2012

I have submitted a DCR to connect.  Feel free to vote for it if you think it 
would be more intuitive and helpful to have power configurations be assigned as 
a client settings like all the dozens other like settings rather than attached 
to collection properties.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 5:35 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Power management in SCCM 2012

Only a guess, but it was probably designed and implemented before client 
settings packages were in 2012. The power management piece was back-ported for 
inclusion in 2007 R3 and so probably got bumped to the top of the priority list 
and was also designed to work with 2007 which of course didn't have client 
settings.

File a DCR (because you're right, it does make more sense in client settings).

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Miller, Todd
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 5:04 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] Power management in SCCM 2012

Does anyone know why power management is not included in the client settings 
schemes, and rather is set as a property of a collection?  It seems to me like 
the power management configs would be a natural fit with the client settings 
scheme and their ability to set priorities.  To me this seems like a really odd 
design choice, so I was wondering if anyone know the reason for it.

________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________



________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________

Confidentiality Statement: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential. They are intended for the named recipients only. If you have 
received this email in error, please notify the system manager or the sender 
immediately and do not disclose or provide copies of the contents to anyone.



Reply via email to