Ouch! There are many things that can cause an antivirus scan to slow down like that. I can't tell you what was happening in your environment at that time, but I can tell you that scans of that nature shouldn't take as long as you experienced. SCEP is usually rated as one of the quicker products on the market.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Marcum, John <jmar...@babc.com> wrote: > So a big problem we had was when a virus outbreak happened MANY computers > saw the same infected files on the network. That turned into a total > nightmare. We attempted to scan just one volume on our SAN and it took over > 2 weeks to scan 10Tbs. By the time the scan completed the volume was > reinfected. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 9:09 PM > To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com > Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection > > Granted this was from FEP but it still applies. Quarantine, never delete > so you can go back if need be > > C:\Program Files\Microsoft Security Client\Antimalware\mpcmdrun.exe" > -restore -name Program:Win32/PowerRegScheduler > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 9:48 PM > To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com; Nash Pherson > Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection > > I came up with a way to recover files, remotely using psexec. It was > pretty easy. > > -----Original Message----- > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:19 PM > To: Nash Pherson; mssms@lists.myitforum.com > Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection > > > Add me to thay list and you now know an uphappy customer. The support is > horrible. There's no central recovery point. Out of the box SCEP doesn't > even tell thou what files it quarantined. CSS actually told me I'd have to > go to each and every machine to clean and recover files. > > So, yes it's super easy to implement because it doesn't really have any > features. It's a great product until you need it then you are screwed. > Well, at least if something gets past it you are. > > And. ... > If you have any virtual machines protect it doesn't integrate at the hyper > visor level. > > > ----- > On Sep 10, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Nash Pherson <na...@nowmicro.com> wrote: > > > SCEP is the easiest product to successfully manage, and of course you have > already paid for it (not cheap... its actually horribly expensive... but > you've already paid for it). > > While Kaspersky may have incrementally higher detection rates, the > conversation really needs to be centered around whether or not Kaspersky is > so much better that it warrants paying for two antivirus products. With > almost every customer I've worked with, the business decision has been to > go with SCEP and I have yet to see an unhappy customer. > > > > > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of SCOTT Nick D > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 15:42 PM > To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com > Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection > > Thanks, I'm debating whether to rollout the new Kaspersky client or this > once we go to ConfigMgr 2012. Kaspersky has had great detection rates for > us and I'd hate to go with something that's just okay. > > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> > [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gerlak, Matthew > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 1:37 PM > To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' > Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection > > Same here it's a lot cheaper and the guys that do our pen test say it's > better than the McAfee product we had. > One thing I don't like is no way to see active file scans like you can in > McAfee but no complaints at all. > Love the product and easy of management and rollout. > > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> > [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of John Aubrey > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:26 PM > To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' > Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection > > We moved 4 years ago and haven't looked back. Works as well if not better > than the Symantec. > > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> > [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of SCOTT Nick D > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:24 PM > To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> > Subject: [mssms] System Center Endpoint Protection > > I'm curious what everyone's thoughts are on SCEP. How does it compare with > other anti-virus products? I'm curious to see if it's worth implementing > and moving away from other anti-virus products. > > Nick Scott > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is > addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this > message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this > email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This > email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The > unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it > contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are > those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. > Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other > contract. > > > ________________________________ > > > Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is > addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this > message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this > email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This > email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The > unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it > contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are > those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. > Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other > contract. > > > ________________________________ > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be > protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have > received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to > this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. > > ________________________________ > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be > protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have > received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to > this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. > >
