LOL, me too. We only put the SQL volume on SSD, the others run on regular fast disks. So they’re at least happy our entire environment isn’t using SSD’s.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:13 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] Current Branch - Safe to go all virtual servers? It works fine for me, but our VMware guys hate my server, it chews up more resources than anything else. All depends on how much resources your server gets. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Burke, John <john.bu...@bellaliant.ca <mailto:john.bu...@bellaliant.ca> > wrote: Hi folks, We got a little push back against going physical and perhaps my thinking is out of date. In the past we have gotten burned by I/O on virtual servers when we had a primary virtual server. Would you folks say it’s ok to have virtual servers for primary and secondary sites now a days?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
