Switches are more interesting than your avg person... On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why would I ever want to sit and manually talk to switches? Maybe I'm > missing something but that sounds hellish.... > > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Andreas Hammarskjöld < > jun...@2pintsoftware.com> wrote: > >> Don’t think you boys talk to the switches do you, instead it’s still an >> agent on every machine right? >> >> >> >> //A >> >> >> >> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: >> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Ed Aldrich >> *Sent:* den 27 juli 2016 18:21 >> >> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com >> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] AMT/OOBM >> >> >> >> “Now that would be a product in its own…” >> >> >> >> There already is. >> >> >> >> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [ >> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *On >> Behalf Of *Andreas Hammarskjöld >> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 26, 2016 2:06 PM >> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com >> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] AMT/OOBM >> >> >> >> I would just implement a PS with the views for wakeup and connect to the >> switches and let them do the WOL. >> >> >> >> Now that would be a product in its own but we are just too busy… so just >> enable the Cisco (or other vendor) WOL capabilities and let a PS script >> connect to each switch and wake em up. >> >> >> >> //A >> >> >> >> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [ >> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *On >> Behalf Of *Ed Aldrich >> *Sent:* den 26 juli 2016 18:45 >> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com >> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] AMT/OOBM >> >> >> >> FWIW, we at 1E fairly frequently encounter new NightWatchman Enterprise >> opportunities who have struggled with AMT/CfgMgr and been unsuccessful at >> getting it to live up to the promise. This is what brought them to us in >> the first place. There are a number of reasons why this AMT/CfgMgr solution >> is problematic but I won’t go into that here. Just wanted to share a >> personal observation. >> >> >> >> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [ >> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *On >> Behalf Of *Adam Juelich >> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 26, 2016 10:53 AM >> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com >> *Subject:* [mssms] AMT/OOBM >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> Just curious how people are handling this in Current Branch? My >> understanding is that it will carry over some features when doing an >> upgrade but a fresh install will not allow you to set this up. Is this in >> the pipeline or have others looked into other options like 1E NightWatchman? >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> >> Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is >> addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this >> message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this >> email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This >> email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The >> unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it >> contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are >> those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. >> Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other >> contract. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> >> Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is >> addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this >> message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this >> email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This >> email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The >> unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it >> contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are >> those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. >> Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other >> contract. >> >> >> >> > >
