Good question, I haven't thought about this before.

If using Application Method you'd probably have to use Detection Method for
Version => xxx.xx
Otherwise, standard Package deployment would work.

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I think the only way it would go back and forth, is if you select “Always
> rerun”.  I typically select “rerun upon failure”, or something to that
> effect.
>
>
>
> So, deploy the base app with SCCM, then import and upgrade/patch using the
> SCUP import.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Chris Carbone
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 23, 2018 9:15 AM
> *To:* '[email protected]' <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [mssms] Questions around deploying with SCCM/SCUP
>
>
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> This is probably a goofy question but wanted to see how others are
> handling this. We recently purchased PatchMyPC licenses to leverage
> patching 3rd party applications. I was not aware that this will only update
> existing installed applications and you cannot use it for pushing software
> to machines that never had the software installed.
>
>
>
> How is everyone handling I guess the, “base” version of your applications
> in SCCM? Do you just update the detection method to include the newest
> build from SCUP so it will always show as compliant in software center? Or
> do you update the base version every so often? I guess if you are not
> careful and push out the base application and leave it out there, then down
> the road also push out a newer update with the SCUP version, the machine
> will go back and forth installing the old one and newer one.
>
>
>
> I also have a couple steps in my TS to install applications during OSD and
> I guess with SCUP when it imports into SCCM, shows up as a software update.
> I know how software updates and task sequences do not work all that great.
> Are you also not using SCUP/PatchMyPC for OSD applications? Or found a
> dependable way to do this?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
> Chris
>
> This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
> me by telephone immediately.
>
>
>
>



Reply via email to