HI Read the "real time stamp counter" from the cpu...
Regards Max ----- Original Message ----- From: "Weston Fryatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 12:24 AM Subject: Re: [msvc] System Clock > If the hardware doesn't support a high-performance counter then use my > current method of GetTickCount() or is there a better method than this? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "TJ Houston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 6:02 PM > Subject: Re: [msvc] System Clock > > > > Yep. > > > > QueryPerformanceFrequency() is also used to tell whether the hardware > supports > > a high-performance counter, at all, so you should probably call it first, > > anyway. > > > > ~TJ > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Weston Fryatt > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 11:22 PM > > Subject: Re: [msvc] System Clock > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > So, I use QueryPerformanceFrequency to figure out how many "counts" per > > second, right? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > msvc mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > See http://beginthread.com/mailman/listinfo/msvc_beginthread.com for > subscription changes, and list archive. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > msvc mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > See http://beginthread.com/mailman/listinfo/msvc_beginthread.com for subscription changes, and list archive. > > _______________________________________________ msvc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] See http://beginthread.com/mailman/listinfo/msvc_beginthread.com for subscription changes, and list archive.
