Hi > >I believe, and I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, that you can > >now natively compile Java in some circumstances, which I would imagine > >improves the performance significantly. (No, I'm not changing tack, I still > >don't like Java). > > But doesn't that remove the whole reason for it (portability)?
You could argue the same about .Net. I don't know the details with Java, but I would imagine you have the option to compile nativly at installation time. At the end of the day you still have the same code base/byte code, you can jsut do a number of different things with it. Regards Paul Paul Grenyer email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.paulgrenyer.co.uk Aeryn: http://www.aeryn.co.uk Over £100 on a toaster? I thought £40 for my kettle with coloured lights was extravagant! _______________________________________________ msvc mailing list [email protected] See http://beginthread.com/mailman/listinfo/msvc_beginthread.com for subscription changes, and list archive.
