> I see only one option to extend the I/O address range. B1 shouldn't be
> connected, because its value is quite random (equals B with OUT (C),A and
I just read the ADVRAM specs and it appeared that this is of vital
importance. And since I actually see no reason why this part of the I/O
address should NOT be passed (it also is difficult, technically seen), and
the 'extended' I/O devices can simply ignore those bits, my statement that
B1 shouldn't be connected is kind of bullshit.
~Grauw
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ICQ: 10196372
visit my homepage at http://grauw.blehq.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****
