On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
> I prefer to use YYYY/MM/DD:
> - if you sort it alphabetically it's also sorted chronologically
This argument is strong enough for me. YYYY.MM.DD is my choice,
and I must agree with Pablo when he says YYYY.MM.DD is the most apropriate
separator, since it looks like a version number.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ricardo Bittencourt http://www.lsi.usp.br/~ricardo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Ricardo is subtle, but malicious he is not"
------ Uniao contra o forward - crie suas proprias piadas ------
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
