On Tuesday 27 February 2001 16:28, you wrote:
> That's possible as well, to use a recursive flooding algorithm. But I think
> it's messier to implement, especially in assembly.
Hm, that's why you should define the *algorithm* as a recursive one and then
use some recusrion removal tactics for the *implementation*, so you end up with
an efficient sequential program. :->
> I wrote that I took it from our standard algorithms library. Guess who put
> the algorithm in there... Anyway, it is an existing standard algorithm and
> real programming gurus know they shouldn't re-invent the wheel. ;)
Completely true. And it's a beauty :-)
</me hands over the 'programming guru' insigna to MtH :-)>
Greetinx,
Eric
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
