In terms of providing a rich API while keeping the code as simple for the students as possible, i like the idea of keeping the existing code the same, but have them pass the .class object, and then using browser side reflection.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Matt Giuca <[email protected]> wrote: > Note: I tried to explicitly use java.io.Serializable on the client, but got > errors in both the dev mode and compiler that key classes did not exist > (such as ObjectOutputStream). I suppose it is pretty hard to write this code > for JavaScript (well, to be precise, serialization is easy, but > deserialization is extremely difficult, since you need to be very reflective > and construct objects of arbitrary classes out of nothing). > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mugle-dev > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mugle-dev > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mugle-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mugle-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
