On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 04:52:01PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > I think mtraceur pinged me on IRC a while ago, proposing an UploadWizard > bug triage. If I remembered correctly:
I did! It was mostly hypothetical, I also pinged some frequent community contributors to try and see if we couldn't get some traction. I think the time is approaching to actually plan this. > Any specific aspects or topic in mind? Some general "let's retry random > reports if they are still valid"? Or more looking at priorities of > tickets? A little of both, I think. Some things may have gotten fixed, other things may need follow-ups, yet more things may need to be reprioritized. > If retesting reports: Would retesting take place on > http://commons.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard , I > assume that the broken first image and the missing templates exposed in > the summary are "alright"? (Asking because this might confuse potential > volunteers trying to reproduce issues there.) We could probably have people test on beta-commons, I don't see any reason our testers wouldn't be able to test the rest of the pipeline even if the tutorial is not there. Thanks! -- Mark Holmquist Software Engineer, Multimedia Wikimedia Foundation [email protected] https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/User:MHolmquist
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Multimedia mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia
