One correction. > 1. multicast router support > I almost agree with Behcet at this point. This draft should focus > only on the case MAG acts as MLD proxy. All descriptions related to > the case MAG acts as multicast routers (i.e. PIM routers) should be > completely removed. > (I would say WG does not need to decide only one solution. It
I would say WG can provide different solutions for different scenarios. > sounds reasonable for this WG to provide both scenarios, "MAG=MLD > proxy" and "MAG=PIM router". Both are beneficial for some condition > or situation. The decision which scenario should be selected is an > operator's or provider's choice, accouring to their conditions or > situations. Well, it does not relate to the direction of this > draft. I'd like to stop discussing about it here.) Regards, -- Hitoshi Asaeda _______________________________________________ multimob mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob
