Hi all, Before shepherding this document to IESG we would like to get consensus opinion on one issue regarding this document that came up recently. Please refer to my conversation with Thomas on the list.
ISSUE: Multimob WG has not worked on PIM at MAG for receiver mobility, we only worked on Proxy at MAG as per RFC 6224. However draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07 covers PIM at MAG for source mobility starting with Section 4.3. Question: Do you support covering PIM at MAG for source mobility, then say YES, if you do not support it then say NO. We need as many people as possible to express opinion on this issue. The deadline is one week from today, January 16, 2014. If WG consensus does not exist, we will ask the authors to remove PIM at MAG sections (subsections) and we will submit the revised document to IESG. Regards, Behcet
_______________________________________________ multimob mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob
