Dear all, I finished my review while watching Superball 2014 :-), here it is:
- remove MIPv6 from the title Sec. 2 In addition, the following terms are introduced: where are the terms? Sec. 3.1 subnet link use on of them when the group is natively received. What does this mean, please explain As group membership information are s/are/is Sec. 3.2 FMIPv6 coverage is out of scope as it applies to MIPv6, so remove this section Other sections may need adjustment based on this Sec. 4.1.1 As FMIPv6 is out of scope, this section needs to be rewritten to cover PFMIPv6 (if any) Section 5 Here you may add one sentence saying that these structures can apply to MIPv6? Sec. 5.3 The size of this option in 8 octets s/in/is Last but not least, I think the draft finishes without a discussion of why this solution is needed. We need some text on this. I don't know if the reference "FMIPv6-Analysis" could be useful. Regards, Behcet
_______________________________________________ multimob mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob
