hi
there is no such thing as a "valid atr for muscle" because the atr is related to
the CARD and not to the applet inside. the atr gives technical parameters about
the communication interface, see ISO7816-3 for that:
3b: direct convention
77: Y1=7={TA,TB,TC}, K=7 number of historical bytes
94: TA1 : Fi=512, Fmax=5 MHz, Di=8
00: TB1 : deprecated (electrical parameters)
00: TC1 : extra guard time: none
62:02:01:00:00:ff:07 historical bytes
Applets are allowed to change the historical bytes of the atr when the applet is
selected by default, but that behaviour is not common.
so what you're seeing is probably a valid atr for a cyberflex. which is quite an
old card, by the way.
I don't remember if select application returns interesting info in the muscle
applet.
To test your card, you have to send select application with the AID you selected
for the muscle applet, then send an applet command as specified in the applet
spec. If you get a reply, then the applet is installed successfully.
Sébastien Lorquet
Le 28/02/2014 09:03, wully a écrit :
> Hi
> Thank you for your informations. Now, I am completely confused.
>
> I have loaded the MUSCLE-applet into cyberflex eGate 32k Developer
>
> This applet is active, as shown in many earlier posts.
> But I don't understand, what has to be done, as to run the muscletest to
> success!
> muscletest gives allways "token unknown".
>
> I think, that there is something missing, but I don't find what.
> I have also seen, that after loading the muscle applet, th ATR has changed.
>
> Original cyberflex (card in status nascendi, no applet loaded):
> $ opensc-tool --atr
> Using reader with a card: REINER SCT cyberJack pp_a2 (3865505373) 00 00
> 3b:75:94:00:00:62:02:02:01:01
>
> with MUSCLE-Applet and priviledge 4:
> $ opensc-tool --atr
> Using reader with a card: REINER SCT cyberJack pp_a2 (3865505373) 00 00
> 3b:77:94:00:00:62:02:01:00:00:ff:07
>
>
> Is this the valid ATR for MUSCLE?
> Why does it not work?
>
> wully
>
>
>
> On 27.02.2014 21:00, muscle-requ...@lists.musclecard.com wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:41:22 +0100
>> From: Ludovic Rousseau<ludovic.rouss...@gmail.com>
>> To: MUSCLE<muscle@lists.musclecard.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Muscle] Cyberflex versus Cryptoflex?
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAGstE8CcjEBvkysYqA_56Vgy=4uxv2iWBCbkUKdOd2tOoQM=j...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> 2014-02-27 10:13 GMT+01:00 wully<wu...@bluewin.ch>:
>>> >Hi
>> Hello,
>>
>>> >About plugins:
>>> >
>>> >exists a plugin for Cyberflex eGate 32k?
>>> >
>>> >the plugin in the framework is for CRYPTOflex, not Cyberflex.
>>> >
>>> >Can one change the cryptoflex-plugin to run Cyberflex?
>> The cryptoflex card is a native card with a crypto application in ROM
>> The Cyberflex is a (general purpose) JavaCard card.
>>
>> You need to load a crypto application in the Cyberflex to be able to use it.
>> It is not possible to change cryptoflex-plugin to run Cyberflex.
>>
>>> >P.S. The muscle web site has many 404-Errors! Why?
>> Because David Corcoran, original author of pcsc-lite and maintainer of
>> the we site has left the community long ago.
>> Give me the URLs of pages with links pointing to non existent pages.
>> I do not maintainhttp://musclecard.com/ myself but will try to help.
>>
>> Bye
>>
>> -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Muscle mailing list
> Muscle@lists.musclecard.com
> http://lists.musclecard.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle_lists.musclecard.com
_______________________________________________
Muscle mailing list
Muscle@lists.musclecard.com
http://lists.musclecard.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle_lists.musclecard.com
