RE: missing reference

[Dziembowski, Kinga]

Bryan, It looks like the spec docs have a typo - the MUWS-Part2-1_0.wsdl  has a reference wsrf-rp:ResourceProperties="muws-p2-xs:RelationshipsProperties”  (Relationships plural)  the corresponding schema defines RelationshipProperties element. I believe it should be fixed – But for now I need quick local fix  – which way you think I should fix it – change to plural or to single??? Thanks, Kinga     Kinga Dziembowski Hewlett-Packard Company Applied Technology Office (ATO) 856.638.6065 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   From: Campana Jr., Salvatore J Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 10:36 AM To: Dziembowski, Kinga; Springer, Ian P. Subject: RE: missing reference   The schema defined RelationshipProperties so what's referenced in the wsdl is a typo....at least one is....   wsrf-rp:ResourceProperties="muws-p2-xs:RelationshipsProperties">  probably should have been RelationshipProperties ....though I'm not sure which way they will go on that....   From: Dziembowski, Kinga Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 10:27 AM To: Springer, Ian P.; Campana Jr., Salvatore J Subject: FW: missing reference   Specifficaly MUWS-Part2-1_0.wsdl indicates that  MUWS-Part2-1_0.xsd should define it – no  RelationshipsProperties in  MUWS-Part2-1_0.xsd …..   From: Dziembowski, Kinga Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 10:19 AM To: Springer, Ian P.; Campana Jr., Salvatore J Subject: missing reference   Ian, Sal, The MUWS-Part2-1_0.wsdl defines <portType name="Relationships"  wsrf-rp:ResourceProperties="muws-p2-xs:RelationshipsProperties"> the RelationshipsProperties is undefined in the muse distribution ( I UPDATED THE PROJECT TODAY AND BUILD LOCCALY). I need this to generate the code. Can you take a look to see what is missing in the proj. Do you want such questions to go to the mailing lists? Let me know. I am waiting for solution…. Kinga   Kinga Dziembowski Hewlett-Packard Company Applied Technology Office (ATO) 856.638.6065 [EMAIL PROTECTED]