+1 I've noticed this problem as well (with service groups). Put it in JIRA with high priority for 2.0.0. We can get a better idea of when it will be done on this week's call.
Dan "Hawkins, Joel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/16/2006 12:53:53 PM: > Musers, > > The current implementation of persistence doesn't retain some of the > semantics of the original "startup-count". One use case that isn't well > served is the case where a ServiceGroup is desired at startup, but the > contents of the service group are always added dynamically. At present, > persistence is a function of the router definition, and there's no > opt-out (or opt-in, we can debate which is more appropriate) ability at > the resource definition level. > > What does everyone think of making persistence override-able at the > resource definition level? > > Cheers, > Joel > > The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It > contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named > addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose > it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately > and then destroy it. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
