Okay, I will add this under /trunk/modules/preview. We will not include it 
in the 2.0.0 release but will make it part of nightly builds (which Andrew 
is working on now).

Dan


Andrew Eberbach/Durham/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/01/2006 01:49:39 PM:

> 
> +1 for me 
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew
> 
> Andrew Eberbach
> Autonomic Computing
> (919) 254-2645
> T/L: 444-2645
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 

> 
> "Hawkins, Joel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> 09/01/2006 01:30 PM 
> 
> Please respond to
> [email protected]
> 
> To
> 
> <[email protected]> 
> 
> cc
> 
> Subject
> 
> RE: WS-ResourceTransfer implementation
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Definite +1. It's really great to see this advancing so far ahead of our
> expected schedule.
> 
> Joel
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Jemiolo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 4:54 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: WS-ResourceTransfer implementation
> 
> Hi Mohammad,
> 
> Thanks for contributing this - we probably wouldn't have started this 
> until next year given all the work we're doing on WSDM 1.1 and the
> current 
> release, so this is very helpful. Given the status of the WSRT spec, I'd
> 
> say we should separate this from the other modules in the trunk and 
> document them as "preview"/"experimental"/"beta"/etc. I'd like the team
> to 
> be able to focus on support for WSRF/WSN/WSDM in 2.x while still making 
> this stuff available to any early adopters. I think we're a ways off
> from 
> the spec being ratified, so we have a while before we have to figure out
> 
> how/when to provide full support for it.
> 
> Here's my +1 for accepting the code as an addition to the build. I'd ask
> 
> the other committers to please vote and/or send their thoughts.
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> Mohammad N Fakhar/Raleigh/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/31/2006 03:49:51 PM:
> 
> > 
> > Hi all, 
> > 
> > A few months ago, there was talk on muse-dev of implementing the 
> > reconcilation specs 
> > authored by Microsoft, HP, Intel, and IBM, and how to align them with 
> WSRF 
> > and WSDM. 
> > The first reconcilation spec, WS-ResourceTransfer, was published
> today; 
> > as a member 
> > of the team that worked on this spec, I have been working on a
> reference 
> 
> > implementation 
> > of it and would like to contribute it to Muse. I'm not sure how/where
> it 
> 
> > should fit but 
> > I figure the development team can help with that. I've opened a JIRA 
> item 
> > with the code: 
> > 
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-86
> > 
> > Here's a link to the spec:
> > 
> > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/specification/ws-wsrt/
> > 
> > Since the WS-RP and WS-RT specifications are semantically similar , I 
> > created an early 
> > reference implementation of WS-RT, based on Apache Muse. The 
> > implementation is primarily 
> > a delegation layer, which serves WS-RT requests by delegating to Muse 
> > WS-RP capabilities. 
> > For example, a WS-RT Put request with QName dialect maps to a WS-RP 
> > SetResourceProperties 
> > operation with a Property dialect. Some WS-RT operations, however, do 
> not 
> > map directly 
> > to WS-RP operations, for example a WS-RT Put operation with XPath 
> dialect 
> > has no equivalent in WS-RP. For such operations, the delegation layer 
> > pre-processes the WS-RT request and breaks it down into WS-RP
> operations 
> 
> > that can be processed by WS-RP capabilities.
> > 
> > The delegation layer is designed so that Muse WS-RT Web services can
> be 
> > exposed over WS-RT dialects just by adding capabilities to deployment 
> > descriptors.
> > This will allow developers to experiment with WS-RT with minimal
> effort 
> > and can be
> > used as a co-existence strategy for those resources that may need to 
> > support
> > both WS-RP and WS-RT clients.
> > 
> > In addition to the server side delegation layer, I wrote a WS-RT
> client 
> > side API that 
> > is symmetric to the WS-RP client API. It enables WS-RT clients to 
> > programatically invoke 
> > WS-RT webservices using WS-RT concepts such as fragments, expressions 
> and 
> > metadata.
> > 
> > I've also added a sample project that is similar to the existing
> samples 
> 
> > and a 
> > command line demo of it.
> > 
> > The sample takes a little bit of manual work to build and deploy right
> 
> > now; if you want to see it in action
> > via a web app, an alphawork demo is available as well: 
> > http://wsi.alphaworks.ibm.com/wsrt/ 
> > 
> > 
> > thanks, 
> > Mohammad N. Fakhar
> > IBM Software Group Strategy
> > Emerging Standards
> > Research Triangle Park, NC  USA
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Phone: (919) 254-2104
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. 
It 
> contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named 
> addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or 
disclose 
> it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us 
immediately 
> and then destroy it. 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to