So far, so good. +1
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Eberbach
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006
2:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] code freeze
for 2.0.0
Looks good to me. +1
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Eberbach
Autonomic Computing
(919) 254-2645
T/L: 444-2645
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
Daniel
Jemiolo/Durham/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/01/2006 01:44 PM
|
|
In
keeping with our release schedule[1], the team worked hard to create a
'release candidate' build for today. No new code
changes will be accepted
for 2.0.0 unless we discover something truly dire.
As we discussed on
yesterday's status call[2], we still have the
tutorial docs to finish and
web site to update, but the code, scripts, and
JavaDoc are complete; this
means that the packages we release at the end of
the month should look
just as they do now except for the content in
/muse-2.0.0-bin/docs.
There is a link to the RC build on the home page.
I have reviewed the
contents of the files and I think they are
correct, so here's my +1 for a
code freeze until post-2.0.0. I'd like the other
committers to
double-check the contents and vote as well.
Thanks,
Dan
[1]
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=muse-dev&m=115462096322607&w=2
[2]
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=muse-dev&m=115705931326624&w=2
Dan Jemiolo
IBM Corporation
Research Triangle Park, NC
+++ I'm an engineer. I make slides that people
can't read. Sometimes I eat
donuts. +++
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=00The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. 