I agree.  From a coding perspective, the way that wsdl2java creates java
files can get quite messy.  I would think that by default, all
capabilities for a particular resource should be grouped into the same
package, unless the muse.xml file is modified to specify otherwise.  But
currently, wsdl2java creates one package for each capability, based on
the namespace.  In effect, if I had one resource with hundreds of
capabilities, then I'd have hundreds of packages for the resource
implementation.  And, each package would basically have only two
classes, MyCapability and MyCapabilityImpl.

Also, the default class names that wsdl2java creates should somewhat
match the operation/message names associated with the capability, as
defined in the wsdl.  This would help make clearer the relationship
between the operations defined in the wsdl and the capabilities defined
in the generated muse.xml file.



-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Jerman (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 7:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [jira] Commented: (MUSE-85) Possible sample project -
System/Device

    [
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-85?page=comments#action_124422
10 ] 
            
Steve Jerman commented on MUSE-85:
----------------------------------


   [[ Old comment, sent by email on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:53:34 -0700 ]]

So the wsdl2java file creation creates files..

The package name is taken from the Namespace, but the actual Java files
created (which seem like one per resource rather than one per
capability) are called MyCapability.java and MyCapabilityImpl.java.
Looking at the code, this seems to be hard coded.

Steve



> Possible sample project - System/Device
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MUSE-85
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-85
>             Project: Muse
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: Other
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Steve Jerman
>         Assigned To: Dan Jemiolo
>             Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: MyCapabilityImpl.java, TestFile.zip, 
> WSDM-POC-Model.gif, WSDM-POC-Model.gif, xml.zip
>
>
> OK, attached isa diagram which shows the model I am trying to create
WSDM interfaces for. Also attached is a Zip file with a set of WSDLs.
Basically I started with some generated XSD/WSDL and then decided that I
should hand code a proto that validated correct and did the right stuff
and use that as pattern. The system.wsdl file was the result. I *think*
it should create a simple WSDM resource implementation with
getResourcePropertyDocument and getResourceProperty operations. It sort
of looks like thats the case.
> A few questions.
> What would some code look like that could handle multiple instances of
System. Do I need to do anything different?
> Surely the Java interfaces generated are for the ManagedResource? They
don't seem to be Capapability implementations.
> Looks like the name of the Java files is hard coded. Is there a better
way to handle this?
> I would like to get this sample up and runing first and then expand
out to the rest of my model (and all the configuration I have in mind).
> Steve

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to