[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517019
 ] 

Kam K. Yee commented on MUSE-244:
---------------------------------

This feature request encompases/requests multiple functionality which can be 
broken down into more individual, granular items:
- A flexible infrastructure and initial, extensible suite of unit tests
- A flexible infrastructure and initial, extensible suite of functional tests
- A flexible infrastructure and initial, extensible suite of stress tests
- A flexible infrastructure and initial, extensible suite of conformance tests, 
and
- A flexible infrastructure that will automatically set-up and execute the set 
of tests listed above on the supported platforms and levels of pre-reqs.

I'd like to propose splitting up this feature request into sub-features or 
individual features altogether.
Being new to this project/process, I'm not sure which approach will normally be 
followed.
Any comments on what the better approach is?


> Test/compliance framework for Muse
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MUSE-244
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-244
>             Project: Muse
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Other
>            Reporter: Balan Subramanian
>            Assignee: Dan Jemiolo
>             Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>
> A test framework is required for Muse. This framework will:
> 1. help in testing - individually and in combination - the various WSDM 
> capabilities implemented in Muse
> 2. help users test their own endpoints
> 3. help run stress tests 
> 4. Manage deployments on various target platforms and their combinations 
> (OSGi (Equinox, others), J2EE (WAS or Tomcat) each with either axis2 or mini) 
> for different operating systems and JDK versions
> 5. Provide ability to automatically executing test suites aimed at 1) 
> endpoint function 2) standard implementation testing 3) compliance testing 
> using the SOAP messages
> There have been a number of conversations about such a framework on the 
> mailing list led primarily by Andrew Eberbach. Those will be collected and 
> consolidated under this feature requirement.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to