"ITSUMI ken-ichi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > include-tag inside literal-tag expand as muse-tag at 3.02.93, but > not expand at 3.02.90. > > <literal><include></literal> > > I think 3.02.90 is right, isn't it?
Actually, 3.02.93 is more correct. The <literal> tag inserts its contents as-is, without any changes. If you look at the published document, you will see that <include> is there, but the browser hides it. In order for this to do what you want, either write (if you want it to show up in a monospace font): =<literal><include></literal>= or if you want it to show up in a normal font, do: <verbatim><include></verbatim> Both of these escape the "<" and ">" characters so that the web browser does not hide the text. -- Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/ Interests: Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net /` |\ | | | Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC |_] | \| |_| Reclaim your digital rights by eliminating DRM. See http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm for details.
pgpHRBTKT8dtA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Muse-el-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/muse-el-discuss
