I am quite late but +1 Kinga
On 3/3/06, Pinder, Simeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Sal, > > This sounds good. Bringing IBM on board and adding Eclipse tooling > support would be great! > > +1 > > -Simeon > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sal Campana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 1:56 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Muse++ - The future of the Muse Project > > > We are currently looking at merging the three Apache projects (WSRF, > Pubscribe and Muse) into a single entity under the Muse project. While > I have done some work on this there have been other things happening > which have made me reconsider the project as a whole. > > We have been talking with a team at IBM, whom we work with through the > spec committees, to do a joint next-generation implementation of WSDM, > and its sub-specifications. The implementation would not only position > the WSDM effort in a more future-proof way (i.e. move towards WSDM 2.0), > > but continue to move the project forward in a positive direction. IBM > has code which they would like to contribute as the foundation for this > effort. The code will initially be run in Axis2 which would please > those who are seeking an Axis2 implementation of WSDM (WSRF,WSRN, etc). > > > IBM is willing to contribute base code, which will be reviewed by us, > and developers to the effort. IBM would like to be part of moving the > Apache WSDM effort forward, and is excited about the possibilities of > being part of the project. They are even planning on contributing > tooling around this effort to the Eclipse Project. > > I believe this to be the right thing to do for the direction of the Muse > > project. Bringing IBM to the project will entice more users, generate > more interest in the project and bring more active committers moving the > > effort forward. > > Here is my +1 for this effort. I hope others will join me in support of > > this. > > I apologize that I have not been forthcoming thus far, however I had to > consider the legal side of things before making any statements regarding > > this. >
