I've sent an email to you with the attached files as I didn't want to
fill up the members email boxes, but it's based on the wsdl-template
from the muse website with all the WSN and WSDM parts removed


/Lenni
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Eberbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 12 February 2007 16:28
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: wsdl2Java -proxy

Hi,

Can you provide more details on the wsdl you are using? This code did 
change recently.

Thanks,
Andrew

Andrew Eberbach
Autonomic Computing
(919) 254-2645
T/L: 444-2645
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
02/12/2007 11:22 AM
Please respond to
[email protected]


To
<[email protected]>
cc

Subject
wsdl2Java -proxy






Hello all

After running into a couple of problems with my deployed services when
using the wsdl2java proxy flag (and doing a bit of back tracing to when
I last had a functional proxy), I'm ending up with one question:

Did something change in the proxy generation from nightly build
muse-2.2.0-2007-01-19-02-00-bin to muse-2.2.0-2007-02-02-02-00-bin? I've
chosen these two builds due to the fact that I can get a correct proxy
in the first one but a flawed one in the second (and even with the
newest downloaded today), please note that the server side code seems to
be correctly generated.

Quick overview:

I've 2 capabilities I need to call:
1) Takes 2 strings and returns an EPR
2) Takes 1 string and returns en Element

These two capabilities get a proxy in the
muse-2.2.0-2007-01-19-02-00-bin but in the newer version nothing is
generated for these two.

Am I missing the bigger picture or?

/Lenni

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to