Good point, I never realized there was a method to call with just the producer's epr. From the example in the docs I assumed it was missing the source and that's why it had ( , producerEPR) as signature.
lenni.madsen wrote: > > Oh how I hate to be too fast typing than I'm reading the specs... > > Both are correct depending on what you wish to achieve, my approach does > not account for the source as I'm always producing from within my source > capability, whereas Mr. Solomon's approach takes into account the > possibility of have a source outside the resource actually producing the > notification. > > But as Mr. Solomon I don't see why you would need to send information > from the consumer to the producer in order for it to produce your > notification. > > /Lenni > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-communicate-with-the-notification-producer-tf4101940.html#a11676107 Sent from the Muse User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
