What I meant to say:
The factory included has the potential to instantiate resources
programatically of other services than it's own, so that
1) you can have some resource monitor call the factory and ask it to
instantiate more version of a service
2) provide an easy way to instantiate services with specific
ResourceID's if needed (the same code can be used for serverside calls
only, if left out of the internet exposed WSDL)
Now if the CounterResourceIdFactory does allow for ResourceID's of a
different type than MuseResource-XX I don't really know.
/Lenni
On Jun 2, 2009, at 17:02 GMT+02:00, Francesco D'Andria wrote:
Dear Lenni,
First of all, thank you so much for the example you sent to us last
week.
BTW I would like to know if, when you say "it includes a small
factory to
showcase ho to create resources on the fly, ", it means that, to
specify my
RsourceId, I need to include a factory. I was convinced I could
reuse the
factory implementation provided by MUSE (I'm speaking about the "
CounterResourceIdFactory").
regards
Francesco
2009/5/30 Lenni Madsen <[email protected]>
all right, it seems most of the issues is related to my laptop
environment,
there must be some settings that are out of whack. In any case I've
attached my general idea for the wsn-producer example, it includes
a small
factory to showcase ho to create resources on the fly, mind you if
you need
to programatically change the ResourceID of your resource instances
you
would need to edit the EndpointReference in the WsFactory step
createWithEprOperation
before the line with next.initialize(); I've left room in the
operation
call to support a call with the desired ResourceId, though I haven
implemented the actual code to make it happen, as it's "just" a
simple xml
edit operation.
Mind you this code should work, though as this an initial delivery
chances
are that there might be a bug or two :) Also the code was run on a
Mac so
make sure you edit the build.properties to reflect your system
environments.
Happy hunting.
/Lenni
On May 25, 2009, at 22:51 GMT+02:00, Lenni Madsen wrote:
I've run into a few odd issues with my proposed example and due to
a high
workload tomorrow, that I need to prepare for, I'm going to have to
keep you
all waiting a few days more. Hopefully no longer than Thursday. So
far it
generates and compiles, but some of the more "advance" things are
acting up
a bit.
On May 25, 2009, at 13:19 GMT+02:00, Lenni Madsen wrote:
I might be able to include that in the example I hope to have done by
tonight (EST)
On May 25, 2009, at 13:07 GMT+02:00, Francesco D'Andria wrote:
Hi all,
Could someone tell me the right code to create a new instance of a
transient
grid service.
I would like to specify my RsourceId and not MuseResource-1, please
tell me also
the code to interact with the same ResoruceID via other client...
thanks in advance and best regards
Francesco
Lenni Madsen
Security Architect,
Dip. Eng. m. IDA.
Danish Defence IT
Helseholmen 1
2650 Hvidovre
Tel: (+45) 4567 7236
Mob: (+45) 2621 0011
Email: [email protected]
Lenni Madsen
Security Architect,
Dip. Eng. m. IDA.
Danish Defence IT
Helseholmen 1
2650 Hvidovre
Tel: (+45) 4567 7236
Mob: (+45) 2621 0011
Email: [email protected]
Lenni Madsen
Security Architect,
Dip. Eng. m. IDA.
Danish Defence IT
Helseholmen 1
2650 Hvidovre
Tel: (+45) 4567 7236
Mob: (+45) 2621 0011
Email: [email protected]
