oh that's right, plus there are things such as instantaneous frequency and
instantaneous phase.  i think one potential application for sinusoidal
modeling is formant-corrected pitch shifting, i think i'm familiar with the
Zynaptiq stuff

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 2:56 PM Ian Esten <[email protected]> wrote:

> Wavelets are a special case of a filterbank. There’s no sinusoidal
> modeling in them, so no sweep or ramp rate.
>
> On Monday, September 6, 2021, Zhiguang Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm no expert on wavelets but does what you mention approach some of the
>> parameters of wavelets i.e. sweep rate and ramp rate?  I know they can be
>> useful for decomposing non-stationary signals.  Also it seems strange to
>> hear of 'other' parameters within phase vocoder (DFT/FFT) sinusoidal
>> components but perhaps that's just what was taught in school
>>
>>
>> Zhiguang
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021, 1:46 PM robert bristow-johnson <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> i think i referenced a paper from Masri in my paper.  and another from
>>> Peeters and Rodet.  i can't remember but there was some difference.  i
>>> think the other guys were doing sinusoidal modeling and i was doing a
>>> modified phase vocoder.
>>>
>>> perhaps the common point we had is that every sinusoidal component can
>>> have more than amplitude, frequency, and phase in its representation.  it
>>> can also have the frequency sweep rate and amplitude ramp rate put into its
>>> description.
>>>
>>> i remember revisiting this gaussian-windowed chirp thing at Stack
>>> Exchange.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://dsp.stackexchange.com/questions/24191/stft-multiplied-with-gaussian-window-vs-stft-multiplied-by-rectangular-window/36797#36797
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dsp.stackexchange.com_questions_24191_stft-2Dmultiplied-2Dwith-2Dgaussian-2Dwindow-2Dvs-2Dstft-2Dmultiplied-2Dby-2Drectangular-2Dwindow_36797-2336797&d=DwMFaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=w_CiiFx8eb9uUtrPcg7_DA&m=GGHt4WkecJQdVBKdw8FKiqhugSze_Ndss0xpw6SGfLU&s=oYZYmGS9k_uURajW6Z9eJXbAMQFpyAm_TgS5o34fCoE&e=>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://dsp.stackexchange.com/questions/48876/does-a-chirp-like-generalization-of-the-gabor-or-morlet-wavelets-definitions-e
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dsp.stackexchange.com_questions_48876_does-2Da-2Dchirp-2Dlike-2Dgeneralization-2Dof-2Dthe-2Dgabor-2Dor-2Dmorlet-2Dwavelets-2Ddefinitions-2De&d=DwMFaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=w_CiiFx8eb9uUtrPcg7_DA&m=GGHt4WkecJQdVBKdw8FKiqhugSze_Ndss0xpw6SGfLU&s=_6xjVngC_BCX1K_YMErfGCh_WYnO67_4Yo_QrGj4ogk&e=>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> r b-j . _ . _ . _ . _ [email protected]
>>>
>>> "Imagination is more important than knowledge."
>>>
>>>
>>> > On 09/06/2021 1:14 PM STEFFAN DIEDRICHSEN <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I think it’s kind of limited by the correct measurement of the
>>> amplitude and/or frequency modulation. There was some work in the late
>>> 90’s, I remember a paper from Paul Masri investigating options to measure
>>> those parameters.
>>> >
>>> > Best,
>>> >
>>> > Steffan
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > On 05.09.2021|KW35, at 04:29, robert bristow-johnson <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/969581
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ieeexplore.ieee.org_document_969581&d=DwMFaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=w_CiiFx8eb9uUtrPcg7_DA&m=GGHt4WkecJQdVBKdw8FKiqhugSze_Ndss0xpw6SGfLU&s=MHifQsiCsSPM6CISW54A9RPtytVqOtf-5awF_E_Me8E&e=>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3927319_Intraframe_time-scaling_of_nonstationary_sinusoids_within_the_phase_vocoder
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.researchgate.net_publication_3927319-5FIntraframe-5Ftime-2Dscaling-5Fof-5Fnonstationary-5Fsinusoids-5Fwithin-5Fthe-5Fphase-5Fvocoder&d=DwMFaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=w_CiiFx8eb9uUtrPcg7_DA&m=GGHt4WkecJQdVBKdw8FKiqhugSze_Ndss0xpw6SGfLU&s=CqMhcl5GwQKfliXhH-jnPoB5uha3T6BYq7ae8rl0xQE&e=>
>>> (
>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3927319_Intraframe_time-scaling_of_nonstationary_sinusoi%20ds_within_the_phase_vocoder
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.researchgate.net_publication_3927319-5FIntraframe-5Ftime-2Dscaling-5Fof-5Fnonstationary-5Fsinusoi-2520ds-5Fwithin-5Fthe-5Fphase-5Fvocoder&d=DwMFaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=w_CiiFx8eb9uUtrPcg7_DA&m=GGHt4WkecJQdVBKdw8FKiqhugSze_Ndss0xpw6SGfLU&s=hVB_tLkygTyQWmydMPoo6UgVlPTcdF3BB-0z2hML1Q4&e=>
>>> )
>>> > >
>>> > > I still like the idea but it turned out to make little difference
>>> audibly.
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>> .
>>> .
>>> .
>>>
>>

Reply via email to