Hello David!

> I would ask the question as to if your ultimate goal is really to totally
> and completely separate the bands, or, rather, to control levels in a
> subtle, musical manner.
The latter case. Total seperation is NOT wanted, because a single sin-tone
should not jump between two bands, if it is close to the splitting
frequency.
So a reasonable overlap is desired.

> If the former, then ask yourself what happens when an instrument or voice
> straddles the crossover frequency, moving from one band to another. If
> the band borders are abrupt, when the gains are very different from
> band-to-band the result will be very obvious, and unnatural. 
Yes. I fully agree.

> For my purposes, since a multi-band compressor is ultimately designed to
> be listened to, the solution that is least objectionable sonically is the
> one I choose. And if it is simpler, so much the better. :-) 
So, may I ask what kind of filter did you use and how your "splitting
strategy"
looks like?
First order IIRC seems too flat to me, I liked second order better because
the
seperation is more clear.
But I havent played around enough to tell if that also works best for
the acutal multi-band compression.

Regards,

Thilo Koehler
-- 


--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp 
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp

Reply via email to