On Aug 17, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Esteban Maestre <este...@ccrma.stanford.edu> wrote:
> No experience with compensation filters here. > But if you can afford to use a higher order interpolation scheme, I'd go for > that. > > Using Newton's Backward Difference Formula, one can construct time-varying, > table-free, efficient Lagrange interpolation schemes of arbitrary order (up > to 30-th or 40-th order) which stay within linear complexity while allowing > for run-time modulation of the interpolation order. > > https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/Interpolation/Lagrange_Interpolation.html > > Cheers, > Esteban I would think that polynomial interpolators of order 30 or 40 would provide no end of unpleasant surprises due to the behavior of high-order polynomials. I'm thinking of weird spikes, etc. Have you actually used polynomial interpolators of this order? Jerry > > > On 8/17/2015 12:07 PM, STEFFAN DIEDRICHSEN wrote: >> I could write a few lines over the topic as well, since I made such a >> compensation filter about 17 years ago. >> So, there are people, that do care about that topic, but there are only >> some, that do find time to write up something. >> >> ;-) >> >> Steffan >> >> >>> On 17.08.2015|KW34, at 17:50, Theo Verelst <theo...@theover.org> wrote: >>> >>> However, no one here besides RBJ and a few brave souls seems to even care >>> much about real subjects. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> music-dsp mailing list >> music-dsp@music.columbia.edu >> https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp > > -- > > Esteban Maestre > CIRMMT/CAML - McGill Univ > MTG - Univ Pompeu Fabra > http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~esteban > _______________________________________________ > music-dsp mailing list > music-dsp@music.columbia.edu > https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
_______________________________________________ music-dsp mailing list music-dsp@music.columbia.edu https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
