I guess renaming it makes the most sense. Could we put in a request upstream to see if they have a preference?
On Tue Jan 06 2015 at 10:15:21 AM Fernando Lopez-Lezcano < [email protected]> wrote: > On 01/06/2015 08:07 AM, Janina Sajka wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi Janina, thanks for the report! > > > I upgraded one of my machines from Fedora 20 to 21 the other day and ran > > into the following error: > > > > Transaction check error: > > file /usr/bin/lscp from install of nilfs-utils-2.2.0-3.fc21.x86_64 > > conflicts with file from package > > linuxsampler-1.0.0-6.svn2680.1.fc21.ccrma.x86_64 > > file /usr/share/man/man1/lscp.1.gz from install of > > nilfs-utils-2.2.0-3.fc21.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > > linuxsampler-1.0.0-6.svn2680.1.fc21.ccrma.x86_64 > > > > I resolved the conflict by removing nilfs-utils, but there's clearly a > > bug here somewhere. I'm unclear where to report it, though. > > Apparently the existing lscp lists NILFS2 checkpoints. Linuxsampler > chose to name their new LSCP shell "lscp" and that is why there is a > conflict (I have not tried it, I presume it is a command line controller > of linuxsampler using the LSCP protocol). > > I don't know what to do exactly. I could rename the linuxsampler "lscp" > to something else, for example "linuxsampler-lscp". Probably the only > reasonable option (or I could just leave the conflict there). > > What do others on the list think? > -- Fernando > > _______________________________________________ > music mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
_______________________________________________ music mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
