On 1/17/06, Don Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:07:29 +0100, Björn Krombholz wrote: > > > You are probably referring to the ordering section in TrackTitle? But > > I'm not sure if this is necessary for AlbumTitle as well, because all > > album titles I can think of follow this strict order: 1. main title 2. > > sub-title 3. volume number 4. disc number (with optional disc-title) > > 5. featuring artist. In which cases do you apply a different ordering? > The Subtitle can be a subtitle to the albun, the volume or the disc: > > MainTitle: SubTitle, VolumeNumber (DiscNumber) > MainTitle, VolumeNumber: SubTitle (DiscNumber) > MainTitle, VolumeNumber (DiscNumber: SubTitle) > > are all possible.
Ah, MissunderstandingDonRedman, Part x+1. ;=) SubTitle is only related to MainTitle, while VolumeNumber can have a VolumeTitle, and DiscNumber and additional DiscTitle. Those are not SubTitles in the literal sense, but real (main) titles of entities. I will add those to the page, the result will be an ordering like: MainTitle [SubTitle(s)] [VolumeNumber [VolumeTitle]] [DiscNumber [DiscTitle]] [FeaturingArtist] It might appear a bit too complicated with all those different names, but IMO it's a very good idea to have distinctable names for distinctable attributes, as we recognized a lot of problems with synonyms in the past. #Fuchs _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
