a quick little aside that i'm not sure where to throw into this discussion:
what about instead of thinking of "non-muscian" and "muscian" think of it as "credited" and "non-credited" (the credit being determined by any albums liner notes) there are some "non-muscians" that I feel are important and should be in MB like mixers, and graphic artists and such. Those kind of ARs to me are totally rellivant and I would hate to see those dissapear. marrage seems to me like a "non credited" relation and photograper seems to me as a "credited" artist. Chris Bransden wrote: > Agreed. Personally I think all 'non musical' relationships would be > better suited to annotations. Even better, annotations that can > contain hyperlinks to other musicbrainz artist pages, should they > exist. > > I think if we try to recognise every single relationship one entity > can have with another, without having some kind of free text entry > system for bespoke non-musical/rare relationships, then the system > becomes less useful for the common stuff. > > On 30/01/06, Brian Gurtler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>i'd rather just see the particular AR disapear and put the information >>in an anotation on the artists page. >>_______________________________________________ >>Musicbrainz-style mailing list >>Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >>http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >> > > _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
