> We really need to get this implemented. I'd suggest to load it onto test > after the next server update. Then we should test it and then move it over to > the main server. > > The vacuum cleaner can be added to the test tree, be discussed to death, and > then finally make it to the main server, too, OK :-) > > BTW what is it instrument/other or instrument/wind/other? > > DonRedman
Don Redman wrote: > On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:37:02 +0100, Brian Gurtler wrote: > >> at least one album and a ton of live shows >> it's already been established that it will be added as per Redman >> i'm tired of requesting it. >> >> just add the vacuum like our "minister" said he would. > > Bulbb? > > Um, no I never said anything that would contradict a ruling of our Evil > Overlord. [pleeze Master, i am your deevout servant ;-)]. > > No, seriously IIRC I just said that we should tackle mo's tree first and > then the vac. If Robert has set up a rule then that's the rule to > follow. And if the rule sais no, then it's no. > > So, I'd say: use annotations for obscure instruments. Once you have five > albums with that annotation, send the links to mb-style and the > instrument will get added. > > And finally, just to clarify the situation, I am not a "minister" I > don't make rulings. I am supposed to act as a secretary who handles the > noncontroversial stuff. Actually the Style Council worked so well while > I was away, that I am reluctant to start anything remotely active again. > The less I have to do, the better. > > DonRedman > > > --Words that are written in CamelCase refer to WikiPages: > Visit http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ the best MusicBrainz documentation > around! :-) > _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
