On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:47:10 +0200, Steve Wyles wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Don Redman wrote:
The current "Recording Engineer" debate is a good example: Simon
thought he was requesting a veto (but did not say so explicitly), but
Steve put forward a dissenting oppinion (he did not label it as a veto)
and spared another discussion.
I've just checked my archive and from what I can see, although the
Recording Engineer proposal was mentioned on the mailing list back in
December 2005, there was very little discussion on it. Well, there would
have been discusion, but, it drifted off to a debate about "Mixed By"
The original thread starts here:
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2005-December/001006.html
Thanks for pointing this out. Another reason to request a veto relatively
soon after a discussion has dribbled out.
Interestingly this old thread shows that there were similar objections to
the "mixed by" phrase, which is now implemented, and no issues have been
reported at all. Also Discogs seem to use both phrases without any trouble.
DonRedman
--
Words that are written in CamelCase refer to WikiPages:
Visit http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ the best MusicBrainz documentation
around! :-)
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
