looks whose whining now..

Robert Kaye wrote:
> 
> On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:39 PM, Jan van Thiel wrote:
>> I think that if e.g. inhouseuk (sorry to (ab)use your name, just
>> giving an example), a moderator with a spotless record, had requested
>> these, they would've been added almost instantaneously.
> 
> I disagree.
> 
> If a moderator with a "perfect record" asks to add something that
> clutters the DB, I'd balk too. But I think our moderators with perfect
> records have a good enough grasp to understand when something clutters
> up the DB and when something makes sense.
> 
>> I'm just deducing the current system doesn't work yet, because of
>> personal misunderstanding between people. Whether or not this involves
>> 'whining'.
> 
> Well, the system needs fine-tuning yes. And we're the process of working
> out the kinks.
> 
> The problem is that one person said, "Go" and another person took those
> instructions and went ahead and did what was asked. The original "Go"
> was premature, but I think it would be worse to flounder and go back and
> remove it again.
> 
> People make mistakes, we're all human.
> 
> However, I do appreciate your sentiments. We should aim to be fair to
> all of our users. Spotless record moderators and whiners all alike. :-)
> 
> -- 
> 
> --ruaok      Somewhere in Texas a village is *still* missing its idiot.
> 
> Robert Kaye     --     [EMAIL PROTECTED]     --    http://mayhem-chaos.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> 
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to