I still disagree with the change as a whole but I will propose a restructuring later. I don't feel strongly enough to veto on the verbiage alone.
Cristov (wolfsong) --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "Don Redman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MusicBrainz style discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Subject: Re: [mb-style] change 'Recording Engineer' to 'Recorded By' Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:36:36 +0200 On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:22:40 +0200, Chris Bransden wrote: > On 12/04/06, Cristov Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Veto. IMO this is over engineered (pun intended). There is no clear >> guidance on the difference between "sound" vs. "audio" and we are >> putting "mix" here when we also have RemixerRelationshipType which is >> very much related to the descriptions given for "audio, sound, mixed >> and recording". The only part of this that I completly agree with is >> "master" but it then begs the question of why RemixerRelationshipType >> is seperate. Seemingly these are all intertwined in some aspects and >> should be documented differently. > > i didn't propose/change anything but Recording Engineer > Recorded By. > the rest is already in/accepted/whatever. i'm not touching it, but i > would like to see my proposal be applied to the server (if there's no > objections). Christov, do you maintain your veto? DonRedman -- Words that are written in CamelCase refer to WikiPages: Visit http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ the best MusicBrainz documentation around! :-) _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
